From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Subject: FZ Bible Level 4 Tapes 04/12
Date: 13 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <efac29902e5dc22eeb88964377435eee@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to <squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
LEVEL 4 ACADEMY TAPES 04/12

**************************************************

ACADEMY LEVEL 4 TAPES - Contents

SHSBC = St. Hill Special Briefing Course
ren = as renumbered in the new BC cassettes.

01 SHSBC-299  ren 328 27 Aug 63 Rightness and Wrongness
02 SHSBC-300  ren 329 28 Aug 63 The Tone Arm And The Service Facsimile
03 SHSBC-301  ren 330 29 Aug 63 The Service Facsimile
04 SHSBC-302a ren 331  3 Sep 63 R3SC
05 SHSBC-302  ren 332  4 Sep 63 How to Find a Service Facsimile
06 SHSBC-303  ren 333  5 Sep 63 Service Fac Assessment
07 SHSBC-304  ren 334 10 Sep 63 Destimulation of a Case
08 SHSBC-306  ren 335 11 Sep 63 Service Facs and GPMs
09 SHSBC-305  ren 336 12 Sep 63 Service Facsimiles
10 SHSBC-307  ren 337 17 Sep 63 What You Are Auditing
11 SHSBC-308  ren 338 18 Sep 63 Saint Hill Service Facsimile Handling
12 SH Spec-73 ren 436  2 Aug 66 Suppressives and GAEs

Many but not all were checked against the old reels (as noted
on the individual transcripts.)

**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************

SHSBC-302a ren 331  3 Sep 63 R3SC

R3SC

A lecture given on 3 September 1963

[80 min.]

[Clearsound checked against the old reels.]

> [Applause]
> 
> Oh you're in for it today. I wouldn't have applauded like
> that!  Oh ho ho! Bad business!  Oh boy! You're in for it 
> today. Wow.
> 
> Can't you manage to look scared?  What's the matter?  Don't 
> you believe I'm mean?  [audience laughter]


What is the well-known date?

Audience: September 3rd, A . D. 13.

3 September A.D. 13, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.
And we have a lecture on R3SC.

Notice, Moms no hands. No papers, no notes. Cold, like that!

All right. Now, once upon a time we had something called a
rock slammer. You remember the history of a rock slammer?
All right.

You did a Scientology List One, which is not the L1 in that
bulletin, but the old Scientology List One. And what did
you find in this? You found that occasionally as you went
down the line you picked up a tick, and when you put in the
big mid ruds on that particular tick, you all of a sudden
got yourself a nice, handsome rock slam. So you say
"auditing" to somebody and you got a rock slam, right?

You remember this technology? Well, this meant that
something was going to go wrong in the vicinity of auditing
with regard to this person, by reason of aberration.

Now, of course, punitively, punitively, we said at once all
rock slammers were bad, and they all ought to be shot, and
so forth, until we found out that practically everybody
rock-slammed.

And then, of course, we had to come off of it. But that
isn't all that we came off of. We just dropped that piece
of know-how in the mire and let it lie. You notice suddenly
we weren't saying anything about that at all.

Well, that didn't mean that I forgot it, completely. That
didn't mean that it was utterly gone as far as I was
concerned. But I had seen some phenomena which I definitely
had to straighten out. And that phenomena had to do with
the reason a person doesn't recover under auditing.

Now, that's the whole department head; that heads up that
whole department: the reason the person doesn't recover
under auditing.

Now, this has been with us, actually, since 1949, 1948. It
must have been present then. I didn't run into it head-on
until about 1950, and it became very crucial in 1950. One
of the reasons this would peak up is that in the type of
auditing which I was doing in 1950 there was a great deal
of slippiness. A lot of it was very slippy. And there was a
lot of this and that would work its way through, and you
didn't have a hard, tightly bound process, you see? And as
soon as you got a tightly bound process that was limited to
running of engrams, you ran into this phenomenon of people
not getting well. So again we have run into engrams and
again we all of a sudden come up with this interesting
datum - but not for the same reason - of people who just 
don't recover.

Now, in my catalog of things to be done, this business of
rock slammers and reasons why people didn't get well
continued to ride right along there and take a prominent
position in looking over all new things.

And all of a sudden I collided with the old service
facsimile. But the collide was rather oblique.

And the way we collided with that was by a study of the
tone arm, the necessity to get tone arm motion and the
various positions of the tone arm.

Now, all of that material which you've had in a recent
lecture very germane to this. It became obvious that if an
individual were audited for three sessions without tone arm
action, he got into pretty terrible condition. Bad. Bad show. 
Bad show. Therefore, you had to audit with tone arm action.

I don't say be fell to pieces, but he just wasn't feeling
well - he didn't feel so good. You'd find his session goals
became gloomier and gloomier. In other words, you could
predict any time that a case was going to feel not so good
by noting that he had no tone arm action during the session
you had just run. And this I tested out. And I tested this
out. I watched it, coordinated it and so forth  - no vast
series of cases but that wasn't necessary. I had a
considerable background on all this material.

Now, there we are: person gets no TA action during a
session, person doesn't feel so good.

Three sessions - they feel pretty wog. No TA action. So we
mustn't run without TA action. So it became very, very
important to find out what was stopping TA action. And
there are several reasons why TA actions stop. The basic
reasons are still those; all the reasons I have given there
are very valid reasons. But they fall away from the very
high theoretical to the very easily applied practical
aspect of it. And the practical aspect of it indicated just
this: that an individual would release charge or an
individual wouldn't release charge. And that's about all it
came down to.

Now, that you are getting - now get these slight divisions
here: that you are getting tone arm action does not
guarantee that your PC will feel better. Now, that is one
for you there. Doesn't guarantee your PC is going to feel
better. But getting no TA action guarantees that your PC is
going to feel worse. Do you see that, see? So you haven't
got quite a yes or no.

Now, why the individual who gets TA action doesn't
necessarily feel better is contained in restimulation and
overrestimulation. The individual is overrestimulated: the
restimulation is too high and yet the charge is still
releasing. Now, that's quite interesting there. You've got
maybe fifteen sources of charge that can be released, and
they're all in restimulation. And you're only running one
of them, so you're releasing charge off of that one.

Let your PC's attention wander off of what you are running
and you instantly have added more restimulation to the
case. All you have to do is be a clumsy auditor at Level IV
auditing on the itsa line and you've had it.

Now, let's grade up auditors here - let's grade up auditors.
just in passing. I: Well, we just leave it on accident
whether the guy gets TA action or not. We hope he gets TA
action, see -  Class I. We just hope he does. And it's not
going to endanger anybody very much because the fundamental
questions that they're being asked are very unfundamental.
They're being asked how they cured their lumbosis or
something of the sort. All right, so they don't get TA action.

So the guy gets a percentage of wins and he gets a
percentage of loses, and we just hope the percentage of
wins that the auditor gets at that level are greater than
the percentage of loses, and that he doesn't get
discouraged about it all, and so forth. We just hope, you
understand? Because frankly, at that level of training, we
can't do anything else. See, it's - look at the amount of
technical material which goes into this and you see at once
that it's too formidable.

This guy would go on - he'd have to go on for months or years
of training before he would come up to being able to cope
with that situation.

Well, it's a very small price to pay. Because the funny
part of it is, now with the itsa line, we can take that
chance very nicely and come out with, a great deal of
percentage of wins. But you recognize that the auditor at
that level is taking that chance that he's going to run
some sessions without TA action. He's going to listen to a
lot of natter and he's going to listen to this and he's
going to listen to that. And he's going to get a certain
number of service facsimile-type cases that don't get TA
action, you see; he's not going to get any TA action. And
this isn't seriously going to put somebody in the hospital
or anything like that, because the process isn't that
strong, don't you see? But it's going to be the guy just
doesn't really think auditing is getting him anyplace -  that
sort of thing, you know? And he just feels gloomier than he
would ordinarily feel, and so on.

Well, what's happening with all this? Well, we can't expect
at the level of training of Class I for the auditor to be
able to remedy it. And of course the second that you,
instructing auditors and so forth, come back to remedy this
situation, you are no longer operating in the zone or area
of Class I and you are actually trying to make a Class II
auditor. So you see, that still stays with the definition.

You start saying to this guy - the moment you start saying to
this guy, "Hey, for God's sakes! Read those rules, man,
read those rules in that R1C. Read 'em! You're asking this
person for problems, problems, problems - what problems have
they had in life? And what have they been trying to solve
in life? That's a backwards question, a backwards question,
man! Of course that TA is going to stick." You know? Well,
you're working on Class II, see, straight away. See? So,
you see, the condition still remains as it is in Class I,
which is a relatively uninstructed auditor.

All right. Now, we move up into Class II: we get "with tone
arm action." And the way we handle it there is actually not
with the change and shift of processes, beyond just
altering the question a bit. But we get listening with tone
arm action, and that means that a certain amount of
direction of attention is going to have to be done, even if
it's just directed by the question that is being asked.
"What have you done about your lumbosis?" See? Now, he's
supposed to know the rules of what not to ask, and so on,
and to get TA action, and he's got some various
ramifications there that are pretty good. And he can do
some things in this line, but it's very light attention
direction, don't you see - very light indeed. In fact, we
don't even instruct him to direct attention; we rather tend
to instruct him not to direct attention. For instance,
"Don't drop the E-Meter," you see?

All right, we get up to Class III and what have we got?
What have we got at Class III? We've got a direction of
attention at Class Level III toward service facsimiles and
the state of Clear.

Now we're starting to drop out this endless, wandering itsa
line, don't you see? We're starting to clip this guy for
letting the PC's attention wander off too far into other
subject matter. We're supposed -  that auditor at the level
of m is supposed to be able to control the PC's attention
to keep the PC's attention on what the PC is supposed to be
talking about. We get - the limitation of attention is what
enters in here, see, to some degree. We start telling the
fellow, "Now, don't let this PC start wandering around on
the early track. And don't do this and don't do that; and
keep the PC's attention centered on what you're trying to
run and don't let the PC's attention wander over into his
environmental restimulation. And if it is there, clean it
up with since mid ruds." See, at this level we're using mid
ruds; we're knocking down environmental attention. We're
paying a lot of attention to the PC's attention at Class
Level III.

Now, that control of the PC's attention is at a very high
high, you see, there at III. That's pretty high, now. This
PC is really being put in the groove.

This PC is supposed to talk about A and B and his attention
is supposed to be freed up from C and D so that he will
talk about A and B. You get the idea? In other words,
here's control -  control of attention here is getting rather
heavy. That's fine, has to be.

Now, let's take Class Level IV: Man, you're living with the
lightning now. You've got this PC on a backtrack. You've
got this PC there. You've got him on stuff that is quite
overwhelming.

All he has to do is skid around inside the GPM. All he's
got to do is say "Let me go back up and pick up those two
early items that we missed." Zzzzzp! - and he throws forty
RIs into restimulation. Why? Because he had to walk through
forty RIs to pick it up that are only  - you see - that are not
properly discharged. All right, that isn't so bad, you see?
"Let me repair ... Oh, I see what this item is. Let me
repair it in the earlier goal...." And then, much to your
embarrassment, you have missed a GPM between these two
goals, and he returns up to the earlier goal and throws a
whole GPM into restimulation, consisting of some 230 items
in the Helatrobus. Eeerk! Look, you're walking across Grand
Canyon on a wire one millimeter thick.

Now, if you see the various classes in terms of expertness
of control of the PC's attention, all will start to make
sense to you on the subject of these classes. If you only
see these on the complexity of the information the auditor
has, auditing will not occur. Oh, well, yeah, you know all
about GPMs and you know all about engrams, you know all
about processes, you know all about this and you know all
about that, and therefore you're Class IV. No, no, no, no.
There could be that one element missing - that one element
missing: control the PC's attention with expertise - and you
would not have a Class IV auditor.

Now, you start letting a PC talk, you start putting in the
itsa line on the backtrack. Ha-a-a-a-a-a-a-a! I've done it
myself; I know exactly what I'm talking about, because I've
got a good subjective reality on that sort of thing. "Hey!
I just had a cognition. There's a this and a that and a tho
and a thee, and down there in that engram there's a spot
and a bolp and a bo - oh, my God!" Bow! The roof falls in.
You got the idea? Suddenly throw into restimulation fifteen
or twenty chains of something, see, just with a nice
cognition. There is something earlier! Zoom! See?

Now, the auditor in that particular case wouldn't even have
time to open their mouth, you know? PC is sitting there in
a brown study. You think he's looking over the next RI, you
know? PC all of a sudden says, "I think this came ... I
think this came from ... Yeah, there's a ... there's a
GPM there about eighteen trillion years ago. Oh yeah. Oh
yes. There it is. And it's there and there, and that fits
into the other two and it comes up to here. And then that
is what gives you the background music of all that - 
uh-uh-uh. What's the matter with my throat?" The auditor 
actually doesn't have time to say a word.

Now, how does that situation take place? That situation
takes place when the case is already overrestimulated - 
greasy on the track, attention hard to control. Greasy on 
the track. Now, if this PC is quite a bearcat, he will go 
right on getting tone arm action but very uncomfortably.

He'll go right on getting the tone arm action necessary to
resolve the case, that's for sure. But he's running in an
atmosphere of exhaustion, of worry; misemotion comes up
here or there. In other words, he's a bit overwhumped all
the time. You see, you've gotten up to the point of
overrestimulation, and with this overrestimulation now in
progress, you are still discharging things. Do you see?
Case still runs but the case isn't comfortable while
running. Case will still make it, but doesn't feel like
he's getting many auditing wins, see? Awful hard grind.
Spends most of the time between sessions in a fog, don't
you see? Case still making it and tone arm running.

Now, let's add this other liability. Now, you see that
we've gone over some difficulties here.

Now let s really clobber it. Let's say that this case we're
doing this with has a fragile tone arm to begin with, which
is susceptible to being stuck low or stuck high or stuck
dead thetan. Let's add that liability to all this other
complexity.

Now what do you think is going to happen? Well, the auditor
is going to spend all of his sessions worrying about the
PC, and the PC may or may not spend any sessions worrying
about auditing, or between sessions, but just going around
being blaaah, or having a bad time or being very nattery or
something.

But the auditor is wild. Auditor is trying to get tone arm
action, trying to get tone arm action.

And he keeps looking. He comes back into the session. He
finally got tone arm action in the last session. Oh boy,
finally got it. He got four blowdowns of one division in
the whole session. Oh, that's fine. That's more than he'd
seen for a long time, and so forth. And he comes back in;
he got this PC halfway through a GPM, don't you see? Now
all he's got to do now in the nest session is pick it up
and finish it and that means - you know, was getting tone arm
action, more tone arm action, and you run some GPMs, you
know, and you get tone arm action. That's obvious, you
know, wonderful. That's obvious, and so forth.

And he comes back in, and there's the tone arm. "What the
hell? Well," he says, "something must have keyed in between
sessions. Something must have keyed in. This tone arm is
sitting here at about six and a half. Something must have
keyed in between sessions. All right. All right. Something 
keyed in between sessions. All right."

"Since the last time I audited you ... Now! when was
that? When was the last time I audited you? Last time, last
time now? When - when was that?"

PC finally thinks and thinks and thinks and thinks, and
finally remembers. No tone arm action.

"Now, since the last time I audited you, has anything been
suppressed?" There it sits. Right on down through all of
those buttons, there it sits. PC tells you all sorts of
things, but there it sits.

You say, "That's obvious enough to give anybody tone arm
action," but there it sits! Horrible! You say, "Well, if I
can just finish off the rest of this GPM ... Now, in this
session, if I can just finish off the rest of the GPM ..." 
You say, "All right, now let's pick it up at the last
item where we left it," and so forth.

And the PC says, "Last item? What ... what's the last item?"

"Well, that last item. It was 'absolutably coughing,' you
know," and so on. "Let's pick it up." And the PC says that
and then the needle doesn't twitch and nothing happens and
nothing moves, and ... You realize suddenly that if you
stay there any longer, this PC is liable to do an
around-the-clock and go into maybe a low. tone-arm case, or
something like that. You realize that you're looking at
something here which can't hold, because you're getting
absolutely no discharge at all. And you hit the silk, and
you get out of that. And you say you're going to put in the
itsa line on auditing or you're going to do a Prepcheck on
auditing or you're going to take anything that you've had
as a good way, you know, to key off the case, and so forth.

Now, in this particular case we're talking about, this tone
arm here, let us say, has gone at 5.75. So you say, "All
right, we'll just destimulate the auditing. That's easy.
Just destimulate the auditing and we'll get tone arm action
back, obviously." So we say, "All right. Now, on auditing,
when was - well, how many years have you been audited?" or
something like that, or "How many months? Has anything been
suppressed?" And of course you get the same story as the
since mid ruds. There it sits at 5.75 - no tone arm action.
The restimulation is now too great to permit even the
discharge of the key-in. That's what you've run into. In
other words, you're running this case downhill on a
toboggan. And it all traces back to what? Now, you see,
this is quite a problem I've outlined to you here. And I
see from the looks on some of your faces that you
yourselves have had something like this problem. Now, the
resolution of this problem is therefore pretty gargantuan.
And that's what - just to get it all in line that's what's
been resolved with service facsimile.

Service facsimile, in actual fact, is not an accusative
thing. It is simply a solution that the individual has
himself so restimulated that it won't discharge and nothing
will discharge past it.

In other words, it's a solution that is so valuable, so
survival, so magnificent, that if one got rid of it as a
solution, one would, of course, perish at once like a wax
effigy, you see, would just melt right there, you see, and
be gone. Too horrible to contemplate getting rid of this
solution.

Actually, it is simply an overcharged solution. That is all 
it is.

Now, how does it get so overcharged? Well, it's because the
PC is restimulating it. It isn't being restimulated by
life. There's volition going on here. The PC himself is
keeping this thing kicked in.

This girl has life solved, has life solved: Don't eat.
Every time the boss is mean to her, something like that
happens, "Well," she says, "I don't have to eat. That's the
good, sensible solution to the whole thing. Therefore,
really, I don't really need a job; I really don't need
anything."

The husband, he's a little bit mean, nattery and upset some
evening. So she says she knows what to do about this: He
don't eat. Dinner accidentally burns or something like
this, see? And one of the children gets upset, something
like that. Well, she knows what to do about that: Kid just
won't eat, that's all. That's it. He's had it, see? And all
of this is so complicated and so filled with ramifications
that it actually has become a survival computation. And it
sits there. It sits there like a mountain rising out of the
plain or a dam across a river, and no charge can flow by
it. Because if charge were permitted to flow by it ...

You see, the difference between our rationale, and so
forth, is we know people do things See, it's not on the
automatic, push-button type mentality of Pavlov, you see,
and Wundt and the rest of these birds - gents - jerks - fellows.
Push-button mentality, you see, that it's always caused by
some mechanical thing. No, there's also a being there. He's
also up to something, and that's the further complication,
don't you see? The person can do something, you see? Now,
if you tell somebody that the survival computation is "not
to eat" -  if you told somebody else - they'd say, "You're
nuts!" But not - not this one. See, that is the survival
computation.

Well, naturally, it's aberrated, but unfortunately for this
being, it works: Hubby always gets in line; the kids always
shut up. Don't you see? And she can relax enough about her
job or doing what she's doing, so that by saying "Well, I
don't have to eat," you see, that actually that sort of - she
stops attacking in that zone and sphere. And it actually
has some weird, backwards, upside-down survival
computation, see?

So what it is, is a nonsurvival solution which has become
survival. And it doesn't make sense - not even to the person,
when they begin to take it apart. It really doesn't make
sense, but it appears to make sense. It appears to make
sense. And that solution can become so fixed in the
activities of the individual that the individual feels that
if it were disturbed in any way, life would become
unlivable. And this can be a pretty batty solution.

You maybe are looking at a service facsimile when you look
at a suicide type of thing: The way to live is to dive off
the top of the Empire State Building, see? Now, you say,
"That's nutty." But the funny part of it is when you run
it, if it weren't so pathetic, you would probably be able
to sit there and just almost ruin your stitches, because
this - it's wild! I mean, how this thing works out. l mean,
the way the put-together, the A=A=A and the disassociate,
and so forth, of this is so - so fantastic.

And very often in the early stages of it, the PC will sit
there and they give it to you with such a straight face and
with such a solution to the whole thing and, "Well, yes,
obviously. Obviously, the way to cure a fear of height is 
to fall off the Empire State Building," or something like 
this, you see? It'd be something fantastic. Even that's too 
sensible.

But what it is, is a solution which has become fixed and
which the individual is actually working with. And maybe
they've been overwhelmed by this solution - it's explainable
in bank terms, too - but the individual keeps that chain or
channel in restimulation, And then you start to audit the
engrams of this thing, and all the individual sells you is
bring up more engrams of this thing, but oddly enough they
won't erase.

And this was another source of search. The other source of
search, of course, was why do some engrams erase and some
engrams not erase. That is an old, idle datum - been kicking
around for a long time. Some engrams grind out and some
discharge. Why? Some PCs turn on mass when you prepcheck
them and some don't - mostly don't - but some do.

What's with this PC who does? What's with this PC who can't
erase this particular engram? You go over on the left and
right of this engram channel and you can find engrams that
will erase, but the PC never gives you those; they only
give you the engram channel. That's because they're
obsessively restimulating this particular channel in the
bank. They're obsessively restimulating it, because it's
survival to have that. Therefore, they will sell you as the
auditor that particular channel if it is a service
facsimile, because their penchant is to keep it restimulated. 
So they always sell you that channel.

And then you, you knuckle head, you going to run it out,
man. Why, you've picked - if that person is a 
service-facsimile case, which - not all cases run this way,
fortunately.

Unfortunately for us, many cases run quite easily and
smoothly without any of these complications, don't you see?
In fact a little more than half of your cases will run
smoothly, without these computations.

Well, that makes it bad, don't you see, because then you're
unable to understand this other percentage of cases that
doesn't run smoothly, see? So you say these techniques
work, but on some cases they don't work. Well, therefore,
you have to bring the broad line of restimulation and so
forth. Aberration is always of some use. At some time or
another anybody's aberration on any subject has been of
some use to them - always. You can trace it always - you 
can trace it back. It's been of some use. Otherwise they
wouldn't keep mocking it up. But it normally doesn't amount
to this fixed service-facsimile-level crash, you see? And
it erases, and it handles up, and the guy cognites on it,
and it straightens up, and all that sort of thing happens.

But on a service facsimile none of these things occur. The
engrams don't erase, the Prepchecks don't work, the tools
of the game are suddenly null and void, apparently, unless
you know this little, secret channel down through the
middle of it. And that secret channel is advised by any
tone arm trouble.... That doesn't mean that for a quarter
of a session ... Since you always get the top of a GPM
almost always early on in a case, you're going to find the
tone arm hung up high or something like that. The tone arm
normally will hang up on the first fifteen, twenty items of
a GPM and then suddenly loosen up and tone arm action
restores. That's on a Helatrobus type GPM. In the fast
stages of hitting a GPM, you normally will get a bit of a
lockup. That's beside the point. That's just a point in the
session where the thing locks up. No, we're talking about
the case that gives you trouble with a tone arm, the case
that is a dead thetan, a low-tone-arm case, a high-tone-arm
case or a case whose tone arm hangs up at the drop of a hat.

The full, complete diagnosis of the case is done with the
tone arm, not with how loopy they're acting in life. I
think anybody on this planet is acting loopy in life, see?
If you put it up against survival standards, you'd find it
was very nonsurvival. You cannot be human and be right. So
there's no reason at all to try to trace it back,
analytically, or medically, psychiatrically - say he's got
schitzobonga, or something, you see? There's no sense in
any of this. This is all for the birds. There isn't any
reason to do it off of a graph. There isn't any reason to
do it off of any of your tests. Nothing. The only place
you'll really see this is by putting the PC on an E-Meter,
and then, if the PC's tone arm looks all tight, running the
PC a while to see if you run into the trouble.

You see, you could even be fooled - and some of you will be
by a dead thetan case that merely has a Clear read and a
tight needle. Maybe the person isn't a dead-thetan case;
maybe they're just sitting in the middle of a bump of some
kind or another that's got the needle slightly tight.

And you ask them one question and you practically have a
free needle, see? Needles change in their characteristic.
This may be hard to analyze, but that's the only state that
is hard to analyze.

The low tone arm, the high tone arm - the second you put 
them on the meter ... The low tone arm, the dead thetan:
definitely, always service-fac case. Dead thetan: service
fac. Bang, bang.

That's all.

This person cannot get discharge in life. In the process of
living he discharges no aberration.

So living is a very, very aberrative thing to him. See,
he's right up against it there: there's no accidental
discharge of anything. Give him a birthday present, he
doesn't say "Hey, what do you know!" you know, and his tone
arm moves, even though you haven't got him on the meter,
see? No, nothing like that ever occurs. This guy's tone arm
is fixed all the time, all the time all the time, you see?
Always fixed. And as he lives, he just gets unhappier and
unhappier; life becomes crueler and crueler. And eventually
he becomes a newspaper reporter, you know, or something
like that.

It's a very weird thing how many newspaper reporters I've
seen who are dead-thetan cases.

Restimulation of life is too high for their level of 
understanding.

Now, the low-tone-arm case: definitely service facsimile.
All you have to do is put somebody on the tone arm, see
it's got a low tone arm, see it's hanging down below two
here: nah, service facsimile. That's it. See? Diagnosis
right now, bang; you just know.

High: questionable, but probable. You can question it, but
it's probable. But you just accidentally put somebody on
the tone arm - you just put somebody on the meter and you
find his tone arm is reading high, that's enough, see:
service fac.

Now, case down here at 3.5, 3.75, something like that, with
a fairly decent needle and so forth: some possibility still
exists that this is a service-facsimile case. So it goes
from some possibility still exists to maybe/maybe-not but
probable on the high-tone-arm case.

Low-tone-arm case: yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes - nothing
else. Dead thetan case: well, you're lucky if you can get
them to talk to you long enough to give you the service
facsimile.

Definitely service-facsimile cases.

So any difficulty with this tone arm; any difficulty with
this tone arm ... Now, I'm talking about tone arm
difficulty; I'm not talking about difficulty with a case.
You know, difficulty getting a PC into things and
difficulty getting them out of things. And you can have a
thousand different things that could be difficult in
running a case. Well, just - it's just difficult to run
cases. That's not diagnosis, that's just a banality.

Oh, this guy, every time you let him anywhere near the
backtrack. why, he all of a sudden starts picking up things
at trillions-eight, then there's one at trillion-thirteen,
and then there's one at trillions-six, and so forth. Yeah,
you have trouble with this guy. You have trouble limiting
his line, getting him into something and so forth. Well,
the case is simply overrestimulated. You could use this
same technology and possibly hope you could find a service
facsimile on him to cool it down. Wonder why this stuff
doesn't bleed off faster or why the case restimulates
himself to this degree: Maybe it still lies in the realm
and zone of a service facsimile, you see? Possibility that
it does. It's worth scouting, worth scouting.

But all these troubles I'm talking about are troubles with
the tone arm. Anybody who's got a troublesome tone arm, has
given you a bad time, won't move enough, gets stuck in
these three positions with great ease - no, man, you're
looking at a service-facsimile case.

Now, what you're doing is looking at the normal river of
discharge blocked up with a great, big, high stable
datum - "horses sleep in beds," see - with this slight
trimmings: He knows that if he gets rid of this and if he
no longer believed that horses slept in beds, oh, cut his
throat! Finish him! The hallmark of a service facsimile is
that some time during - in the running out of this service
facsimile - some time during its run-out or between sessions
(you'll hear about it when the PC comes back into the next
session), a person questions the wisdom of getting rid of
it. I don't care if it's jabbing butcher knives in their
right arm. He will question the wisdom of getting rid of
this aberration. And you might miss hearing it on some
cases, but it is always there Sometime in the process of
running it out, they got up to this level.

"Now, let's see, if I got rid of this, uhhhh ... ohhh, I
don't know. I don't know." Say his service facsimile is
"hitting policemen," see? "Oh, I don't know  - if I got rid
of that, man, I just might be in jail all the time."

You look at him in amazement, you know? "If you got rid of
the service facsimile of hitting policemen, you would be in
jail all the time." You don't treat him like that as an
auditor, see, but you'll hear some weird ones. The guy is
in jail all the time from hitting policemen, see? But if he
got rid of the service facsimile of hitting policemen,
something would go very wrong in his life and he couldn't
survive and it would be finished, see?

It's where life has been so overwhelming and he has done so
much overwhelming that it -  actually, it makes no more
sense: he has abandoned it, and in lieu of any good sense
he has erected this monument. See? And that monument is a
monument to total asininity.

"The way to have good health is to smoke cigarettes, you
see, and never take any exercise," and so forth, and so
forth. And you'll hear this guy going on along in this and
you'll hear a dissertation and it seems to be just a little
bit offbeat. And you'll wonder how on earth this -  what this
really adds up to.

Well, without precise assessment you probably could not
establish exactly what it was. But it might be as banal as
"good health." The service facsimile is "good health." How
do you have good health? Well, the best way to have good
health is eat poisonous foods and throw yourself under
trucks wherever possible, and so forth. You see, the thing
is completely twisted around the other way to. It's an
aberrated survival computation, is what it is.

Now, it might better be called a service computation, or a
survival computation - but we already have this term service
facsimile, so we might as well stay with it for the present
at least - because it isn't just one facsimile. It actually
isn't a facsimile at all. It's the guy himself keeping
facsimiles in restimulation because he knows what's best.

You see all this wild aberration inside of a society which
compels its citizens to do this or that.

You're probably looking at third-dynamic service facsimiles. 
They get stuck on these things.

Take the jail system which is used right now in the West.
The jail system is rather interesting.

Because they know for a fact, and all their statistics
demonstrate, every single one of them demonstrates - the
lot - that they increase criminality with the present prison
system. All the penologists know this and they adhere to it
slavishly.

In 1835 a study was conducted to find out what penal
systems were in use around the world -  not to find out which
was most workable, but what ones were in use, And they
adopted the present system in Philadelphia. They adopted
this present system of the cell and the confinement and the
guard and the this and that. And at the time they adopted
it, they knew that it did the least rehabilitation.

I mean, the committee that did this had the data in front
of them that they were doing the most they possibly could
to perpetuate crime by adapting the present prison system.
Now, this prison system today is so general and it is in
use so far and wide, and the present court system - court
system is not any part of it - is so wide and general and so
forth, that everybody thinks that is the only prison system
there could be. That is very far from a fact. There are
actually hundreds of prison systems. And yet they have hung
themselves with the one which they found was the least
rehabilitative, the least workable and produced the most
crime. And that was done by study - by careful, analytical
study. So you must realize that there are third-dynamic
service facsimiles at work. It's a totally nonsurvival
computation to choose the worst prison system you could
possibly choose, and yet they set out to do so.

So I don't think they were studying public safety. See,
they weren't any longer studying public safety. They were
simply studying how to make criminals wrong!

So penology, by 1835, had ceased to be a study of how to
make an honest society safe from the inroads of a criminal
and had begun to be just a system by which to dramatize
"the criminal is wrong," see, so no longer had any useful
application. I don't care what money they're spending on
crime today: If they'd stop spending it, they'd have less
crime. I don't care how weird and aberrated that happens to
look. But I'm just showing you, here is a solution stuck in
the society.

Not to go on this subject, because it's not a horse I ride;
it just happens to be an interesting datum. I got this out
originally and was rather interested that Warner Brothers
did one on this a long time ago. Crime colleges: that's
what they've established. You want to - as I asked you in an
earlier lecture, how is it that argot is the one thing that
seems to be a current slingo that goes along, a language
that carries along, and yet it's the most secret language
there is. How is this perpetuated? Well, it's perpetuated
by the state with its existing prison system. So with that
argot, then, must go all the systems of defrauding,
robbing, murdering and wrecking the society. And they have
gratuitously, at public expense, erected these universities
all over the place in which these fellows can carefully 
communicate to one another the very best criminal methods. 
And this is all done at great public expense.

And that's a service facsimile at work. That solution - the
prison, see -  stands up there right now as the primary
method why the society is going criminal. And yet it is
supposed to be the reason why the society is never
criminal. See, it's erected to protect the public from the
criminal. And there it is, however, educating criminals,
perpetuating crime, going forward in a very businesslike
way at great public expense to do the least possible
rehabilitation for the criminal, make him feel the most
outlaw of any other system, make him feel the most
individuated from the society, spoil his reach and
therefore his sanity. It makes sense to a Scientologist
particularly: put a guy in this place so he can't reach
anything, can't itsa anything, he's naturally - get a case
deterioration. Well, if he's already a criminal because
he's crazy, how about deteriorating his case? Well,
naturally he'll become more of a criminal, won't he? So,
all kinds of actions of this character - I'm not even
standing up for another system.

Frankly, if you just erected a big stockade someplace or
another and told the fellows to go in there for a while,
and we didn't care who they took with us, we'd probably,
you know, have a better system.

If the Scientologist were to go about this - I already
figured this out for the federal prisons of the United
States. The head of all federal prisons in the United
States has required Dianetics to be read, by the way, by
all his wardens. And I worked out a system for him. Too
much work for me to put into effect and so never went into
effect. We are not without friends or connections or
influence, in spite of the fact that some two-bit - some drug
addicts, the Federal Drug Addicts, are after us, because
they're actually not under the government, they're under
the AMA.

Well, that's who pays them, you know? People work for those
who pay them, don't they, normally? Naturally. They, by the
way, recently got some legislation through, I see. Now, so
that anything is mislabeled, all they have to do is arrest
the guy and throw him in prison without a hearing. I was
interested in this new legislation that came through from
the FDA.

When they do something like this, they get a level of
unpopularity that has exclamation points after it. So
they're doing their best, and we'll help them out. The
direction which they want to go, we will help them go, any
day now.

But there is service facsimile.

Government sets itself up a stable datum: "Foods must not
have noxious products in them." And this outfit is now
protecting the public against good electrical equipment and
certifying electric-shock machines that break people's
teeth and spines. And they pass these. But the E-Meter: no,
that's deadly. It's pretty grim - I mean, it's pretty
gruesome when you start to think over the level of action.

Well now, that again, on a third-dynamic level, is a
service facsimile in action. See, somebody put up this
solution that the public shouldn't have to eat noxious food
products or something like this, or poison should be kept
out of foods. That, basically, you see, is a good idea. And
then this idea starts going all mad, and madder and madder
and madder, till practically the only thing that'll get
certified is something that kills somebody. See? You get
the idea? Well, all right, so they must be there simply to
make somebody wrong. I don't think they have anything to do
with anything except making somebody wrong. I don't know
who they're trying to make wrong. They're not going to make
us wrong. But they must have somebody they want to make
wrong, and we're not quite sure who it is. But there is,
you might say, a service facsimile.

Well now, you take any good solution to a situation and
then plow that solution in so that it lower-harmonics. It
goes through several flips. Stays itself, you see, but it's
lower and lower and lower on the tone scale. It finally
gets below all other solutions and becomes itself an
aberration.

Now, it isn't true that all solutions become service
facsimiles. You could immediately conclude this. As a
matter of fact, I have looked at it rather wildly
occasionally and said, "My heavens, if you - if any time you
solve something, why, you're in the soup." No, no, that
isn't it.

A service facsimile is a solution which is insisted upon
but won't itsa. It's a solution which is insisted upon but
won't itsa. A solution, to be a solution, leads to a
further ability to itsa.

Now, if you solve something on the basis of the solution
reduces the itsa or the ability to itsa, then you've set up
a potential service facsimile. This is one of the reasons
why Scientology would never become a service facsimile in 
a society. See, it increases the ability to itsa.

Now, let's look back at the FDA for a moment. They are
taking over a role of classifying for and protecting the
public from making up their own minds about food. They're
denying the public an analytical attitude toward products.
And they step in there and protect the public from
themselves, which is to say, they cut the public itsa. Now
having reduced the public itsa very severely along a level
where it didn't need reduction, they have then set up a
situation where anybody they pass is okay. The public then
loses the criterion of inspection; the public no longer
does its own inspection. They don't buy Salinas Valley
lettuce because it's good and avoid Mexican lettuce because
it's bad, see? But the FDA, aberratedly, because it's in
some wild state, then goes in and passes - because somebody
slipped them a quick buck or something like that (slipped
them Mexican lettuce) - and says, "Well, that's okay. Mexican
lettuce: that's - that's all right, that's all right. Seal of
approval - bang. It's fertilized with dysentery."

Look what happens to the public suddenly. The public can be
caved in by it, because it's opened a gate which is
destructive. See what they are? They are not, then,
increasing familiarity with the environment. They are
decreasing it and leaving this area in a mystery. And it's
all set up on the irrational supposition that they're
infallible.

They had some non-pregnancy drug the other day and it had
wild side effects, and they passed it. They passed it.
There's been several drugs of recent times that have been
passed that are terribly destructive one way or the other.
Now, obviously, some role exists for such an agency. But
every time you set up such an agency, you set up a
potential service facsimile, which will then accumulate to
it a great deal of evil. And the next thing you know, you
have set up a situation where nobody can live with it. Now,
you get how that's done? It's by reducing itsa.

For instance, you'd almost never look for travel agencies
to aberrate a society. See, you wouldn't look to a travel
agency as a primary source of aberration in the society.
They could bring in a little bit. We had a situation here
in England where anybody that could buy a ticket in the
West Indies, you see, could come to London. And some
shipping company made millions shipping everybody to
London. And this was looked on in some particular lines as
something.

And then oddly and wildly enough, the Parliament up here
was faced with the embarrassing situation, suddenly, of
limiting the amount of immigration from one of its own
colonies - very embarrassing. They managed to get over it 
and pass it and nobody has ever heard of it since.

And they've limited immigration in that particular line.
But I'm afraid this wasn't even much of an aberration. I
mean, that's about as close as a travel agency could come,
you see? So it doesn't mean that all these sources are
perfect. Little randomities exist around these other
sources, don't you see? But broadly, those that directly
reduce the itsa - those that directly reduce the itsa and
don't help or support the itsa line in any way - are most
likely to become service facsimiles. They're a solution
without inspection which is too broadly applied.

This girl has a survival solution: She simply says,
"Families are no good." This is what she's made up her mind
to. She holds that in place. She proves it to herself all
the time. She works day and night. She sits there - you can
see her in a brown study, you know? She's sitting there and
so on. "Hmm, yesh. Yeah," she'll say to herself, "yeah.
Proves it. Mother didn't say anything to me this afternoon,
so that of course proves, you see, families are no good." See,
and it all works out. Now, she doesn't have to look to find
out why didn't Mother speak to her all afternoon. And that
brings about a no as-isness of mass. There's no necessity
to inspect.

She's got it solved. Mother didn't speak to her all
afternoon because families are no good.

That's it. She didn't have to inspect the fact that she,
last evening when she took the car out, bent the front
fender and then didn't say anything about it and didn't
offer to do anything about it and put it back in the
garage. And Mama found it at noon and cut the communication
line because she already knows that it's disastrous to try
to talk, you see?

So you've got a situation there. Now, that little ARC break
is never going to blow away, is it? It's never going to be
talked about, not going to be any communication on the
subject and so forth. Well, what's preventing it from being
talked about? "Families are no good." That proves it.

You understand, it gets charged up because every one of
these ARC breaks that contributes to it in its immediate
vicinity charges it up further, and the person holds it in
line harder, and more ARC breaks pile up on it until it
eventually becomes an accumulation of mass. And therefore,
when you prepcheck somebody with a service facsimile around
the vicinity of this service facsimile without hitting it
on, you turn on mass. The source of the mass is nothing has
been itsa'd.

Now, you're prepchecking them this way: "Since the last
session, has anything been suppressed?" Let's say it's
auditing that's the target. This is in vignette; this is
not a real service facsimile - "My auditor is no good."

("There is no reason to answer this question because my
auditor is no good, because auditors are no good.") "No."
Now the case is in a solid, continuous ARC break so it
doesn't register on your meter.

"Since the last session, has anything been invalidated?" 
you see?

"Nope." ("Auditors are no good. Wouldn't do me any good to
answer the question anyway, because auditors are no good.")
You see?

Yet the case isn't thinking this consciously. Case isn't
thinking that consciously. That's just everything that you
ask the case comes up against this.

And you - my God - you're trying to talk to this case. You're
trying to get this case to talk.

You're trying to get this case to do something. And you do
know what you're doing. And yet you're going up against
some kind of a barrier like this in this case. And then all
of a sudden, you wheel back and you say, "Uhh-uhh! I'm a
failure as an auditor."

No, you're not a failure as an auditor. You just didn't
clip the service facsimile that made auditing impossible.
You see that? And this is expressed by the no-motion of the
tone arm action. Because there is no itsa in that immediate
vicinity, there's no, then, dismissal or discharge of the
charge hanging up on it. You see that?

Now, you're listening to this opinion, "Auditors are no
good," on somebody who never inspects an auditor or
auditing. There's no itsa. In other words, the whole thing
is just completely unjustified. How do they know whether
the auditor is no good or not? They've seldom heard one;
they've never looked at them. See, how would they know? And
let's get another situation: I'm very, very sure that some
of you have been over the coals of being considered
immature, or some other way, by either your mother or
father or family -  irresponsible, see? Now, you probably
have never asked yourself this other question: "Did they
ever look at me?" Now, there's lots of mothers, the last
time they looked at little Roscoe was when he was about
two. And they're still trying to advise two-year-old Roscoe
at the age of thirty what he should do about his marriage.
Well, they don't know anything about him.

If you want to give somebody a send that has a lot of
family trouble, just ask them questions along that
particular line, and so on. Ask them what they have
observed about their family.

There's a good R1C. Probably get tone arm action out of
that, you see, because it's on the fringe of something if
they're having trouble with something. And they're liable
to come up with the realization that their family has never
looked at them and doesn't know them. See, we itsa the
situation, some preconceived notion.

Societies tend to get stuck with these things, to get stuck
with some idea. And it's very interesting that this is
probably the way that a society reduces its strength, just
as an individual reduces his strength this way. I feel
sorry for this society, in a number of ways, because in
certain zones and areas which the society depends upon for
its control of mean, vicious, nasty persons (and things
like us), these guys haven't got any itsa line out. Do you
realize what's happening? If you want to look at it
bluntly, these guys are sitting back taking the wrong
actions with regard to certain situations. They're trying
to prevent - through their wrong itsa on Scientology - they're
trying to prevent certain zones and spheres of activity,
which is to say, "the public must not be practiced on by an
unqualified guy who doesn't happen to pay dues to us," and
that sort of thing.

All right, now they're set with certain set, fixed ideas,
see? They believe these ideas. And they believe that what
we're doing and what we have to do with is no good and it's
corn, see, and that it's not any advance on anything.

And my God, during this whole period of time we're moving
right straight on ahead into more mental technology and
more technology about life and livingness than they ever
dreamed could ever exist. We have actually been effectually
isolated and insulated from any further interference, or
from having our energies drained down by being made to
comply with or agree with the mores of their particular
practice lines. That would have slowed us down like mad,
don't you see? We're moving forward at express-train 
velocity.

There isn't any faculty of any college or something like
that is going to tell you or me whether or not we had
better research or not research some particular sphere of
existence. If we can put an itsa line on it, we look at it.
It doesn't then make it "bad" or "impolite," see, or
something like that - "this is why we shouldn't look." And
we're actually traveling as a subject without a service
fac, and it's making fantastic velocity. And here these
poor sods are, whose whole life is bound up in these - you
know, the mustard-plaster level of healing. And they're not
in contest to keep their developmental line coming forward,
so there they sit, and there we go.

How high can it rise before the potential suddenly
explodes? They're nuts. That's what it makes them look to
us. The potential will eventually explode in their faces.
In what way? They suddenly won't have any patients. Nobody
will be paying any attention to them, because they have a
wholly authoritarian educational system. That is to say,
they put it on TV, "You must see your local doctor. Your
local doctor receives you in open arms." Well, they're so
unreal they don't realize that that isn't the public line.
Their word of mouth - I don't care how much advertising you
buy, you got to have good word of mouth, man. You can buy
newspapers full of advertising to get somebody to go see a
movie that's no good and the theater will stay empty,
because their word of mouth is bad, you see? And the word
of mouth on medicine is very bad. Very bad.

And while they're taking fortunes away from people in the
United States for not healing them, and not advancing their
own technical lines, and not really measuring up the way
they should, they're not making the effort necessary to
survive. Why? Because they have a service facsimile on us.
They don't even know they've got it. It's hidden down
amongst their case, amongst any other batty lines.

I had a good news story on the subject. I didn't release
it. It might have woke them up. They have to reorganize the
whole of mental and physical healing before they could cope
with what we're doing. This potential - these poles are
stretching further and further and wider and wider apart,
and eventually they will become a no-factor. That's what
happens to them: they're a no-factor. They simply are not 
powerful enough or influential enough or anything else 
enough to do anything about it.

You may not think that we're growing. But I look back over
any six months of the last ten and eleven years, and
frankly, I hardly recognize a comparable size - just six
months to the next six months. This is a rather fantastic
thing, only this is going on internationally.

Now, did you ever double a penny for thirty-two days? It's
the old mathematical trick. A guy says, "Well, you needn't
pay me anything but one cent doubled every day for
thirty-two days." And somebody says, "That's fine," but of
course at the end of thirty-two days - I don't know what the
figure is. It's either a million pounds, or it's something
like that that it has grown up to, don't you see? It only
takes this type of curve growth going on up.

Now, therefore, they're not impeding what they should be
impeding if they wanted to survive, themselves. They're not
handling the situation within its own zone of reality. And
that's all aberration is, is a failure to handle the
situation in its own zone of reality.

So this, then, is the service that a service facsimile
performs. It makes it unnecessary for an individual to
handle the situation in its own sphere of reality - makes it
unnecessary to do so.

So nobody ever does anything about it; so mass accumulates
up on it. Now, any mass that accumulates on a case, any
mass that accumulates by reason of Prepcheck, any body mass
that occurs by reason of processing and so forth, must to
some degree or another then be batting up against a service
facsimile. And if a person cannot be knocked out on the
subject of a psychosomatic illness of some character or
another by processing, then that must be part of a service
facsimile.

Those things that auditing won't change are, then, rooted
in this other mechanism. They're a solution without
inspection which pulls in upon it all the uninspected mass.
That's all. And of course, mass disappears because it's
as-ised. And when a person does not as-is the mass that is
there, be naturally gets an accumulation of mass. And the
mass that accumulates around one of these service
facsimiles is rather marvelous to behold. And of course,
it's that mass accumulating which holds and prevents the
Prepcheck action. And those are the technical mechanisms
which prevent tone arm action.

If you don't get tone arm action, it's because the
individual does not as-is and has not as-ised any mass in
that zone or area for a long time. And not having as-ised
any, when you get into its vicinity, you go into it with a
thud if it gets anywhere close to processing, getting well
or handling the environment in which the individual finds
himself.

The auditing session, to this effectiveness, extends out to
everything the individual does during the period of time
that he's being audited and every environment he finds
himself in. So that if any service facsimile exists which
is being reacted upon in any of his environment, anyplace,
it will to some degree influence his auditing. And the more
of these things exist, the harder it is for you to get tone
arm action - until it gets impossible.

Now, an individual can have a service facsimile and still
get tone arm action - get some tone arm action. And it would
be better in some cases to make sure that the service
facsimiles are out of the way before plunging backtrack.
The amount of time that you could save in processing is a
very large factor. I've just made a restudy of this. And
I've been brushing off Clear left and right and saying no
good, no good - you know, I mean, and so on, Keyed-out Clear.
And I recently found out that you can stabilize - there's a
possibility here of stabilizing a Clear by the eradication
of the things that will key in. So, you see, if you knock
out a number of service facsimiles out of an individual,
why, the case then stays stable to the degree that it
doesn't still have service facsimiles.

Now, R3SC is an extremely workable process. I have written
it up; it's been released. Of course, one can expect certain 
refinements of a process of this particular character. But 
this is peculiarly complete, because we accidentally already 
had a couple of types of assessment that you could do for 
this. We have the old 2-12 assessment, and we have the R3R
assessment -  preliminary step. They're perfectly adequate,
don't you see? There are slippier assessments that you can
do and I'm sure we'll have some fancier assessments on it
one way or the other, but these happen to be adequate
assessments. And you'll find that the mere inspection of a
folder from beginning to end will give you a bunch of
candidates. Just inspect the folder. Just start turning
over things and looking at auditors' notes and mentions of
this and that, and what the individual has had bing-bang
runs on of one character or another - whether they gave tone
arm action or not, you see? But look particularly for
periods of no tone arm action and then go back before those
periods and find out what was being addressed on the case.
And you'll probably have a service facsimile combo sitting
right there, and just use it in your ordinary steps of R3SC.

You get an idea: let's take a period - we found a period here
the individual was audited for an intensive and toward the
last half of the intensive got no tone arm action. We
notice this from the old, old, old, old auditor's reports,
see? We find out that on Wednesday "form" was addressed by
the auditor and that was the end of tone arm action. We
notice that there may have been two subjects there that
could have been addressed. Well, run them both! Don't be
chicken see?

Now, you can run almost anything with R3SC, which is what
makes it very good. Just don't overrun it. And if the PC
says nor and he can't give it answers and so forth, come
off of it; don't shove it down his throat. With those
ramifications, then, it doesn't much matter what you pick
to be the service facsimile. But if you do a slippy
assessment, which is a preliminary-step assessment, it's a
bingo assessment right dead on - and something like that - 
boy, you get action, man, you'll get action. But if you
pick almost anything else, you will also get some action.

So it's not critical - the assessment is not terribly
critical. Of course, the faster you get what is really the
service facsimile on the case, then the faster your tone
arm action restores and the case reverts to battery. So
there's a lot of ramifications to this sort of thing. But
in the final analysis is, here is a process, full-bloom,
which totally replaces your R2-12 type processes -  makes
them utterly unnecessary - and takes care of this thing we
call a rock slammer, and takes care of body mass and a lot
of other things in cases that we've been particularly
worried about, and particularly takes care of the auditor's
main worry which is "How do I get tone arm action on this
PC?" Obviously, if he can't get tone arm action on the PC,
the PC is sitting in a service facsimile. I mean, that's
the end product of that.

Now, you may have to run two or three or four service
facsimiles, but by that time you're going to Clear. So you
might as well go ahead ant clear the guy: Throw it all out
of restimulation; make the case sit there with a free-flop
needle, and so forth, and say, "All right, I cleared you."
Let the guy enjoy it. Let him enjoy it for a day or an
afternoon or something like that before you reach for the
earlier GPM.

All right. Now, that's R3SC. And I hoped ... I noticed - do
you notice that it's tabulated 3? I want to make a short
note on that. It's the tabulation of 3 is because,
actually, it is a 3 process - being a clearing process. We
rehabilitate Scientology levels against the existing scale,
and that means that your R3N, and so forth, will be called
R4N. It's a reorientation. But I'm not going to reuse
their letters when they're moved up to 4. And there aren't
any other R4s, so they're very easy to recognize, and they
won't get you tangled up in any way.

And then we'll be able to throw these clearing techniques
straight where they belong and there are a few of them
there, so we want them tabulated. We're getting our house
in order, and it's making very good sense the way it's
going together.

That means that there's quite a few cases around here will
have to be cleared before they go on to OT. I'm sorry, but
that's the way it is. 

Thank you.

[end of tape.]




